I recently concluded a brief study of the
traditional (often called the Tridentine) Latin Mass. This Rite simply WAS the MASS before Vatican
II, and had been so everywhere throughout the world for our Romanist friends since
around 1570. I now have a much better
understanding of what “was going on” during those Services which I attended in
my pre-seminary days with some of my Catholic friends.
And though Lutherans sometimes eschew using
Anglican terminology, I think that in matters of the Mass, the Confessing
Lutheran communities, normed by the 1580 Book of Concord, and informed by
our own traditions (if only the Common Service), are the true “via media” between Rome and Geneva—i.e. between the stark polarities of mysticism and academia.
One of the hallmarks
of conservative Protestantism is Bible Study (or as I sometimes waggishly
write: bahh-iii-uhhh-bull study). At their Sunday morning services,
particularly their sermons and Sunday schools (adult Sunday Schools) the emphasis
is on Biblical knowledge: stories,
events, histories, names, places and dates.
It isn’t that one finds Charles Stanley or Chuck Swindoll boring when
they launch into their 30 minute monologues on Exodus (it is usually Exodus; which
is one of my favorite Books of the Old Testament—so I listen J ) it’s rather that
fascinating as the arcane trivia they come up with is (and I am) it’s so “besides the point” since it is usually
devoid of the Christocentric emphasis of the means of Grace found in the preached word of Christ Crucified for
the forgiveness of sins and applied through absolution, Law & Gospel, and
the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar.
Yeah, it’s nice to know the dimensions of the Tabernacle and various
Hebrew feasts…but to what end, if it's not a "type" of the Bleeding Lamb the Incarnate
Temple of God which is placed into our lips every Sunday! We are of course to study and learn the Scriptures, for they make us wise unto salvation. But we read, study, learn, and inwardly digest the Word of God so that we would better understand the Incarnate Word of God.
And now that I have a better understanding
and appreciation of the Tridentine Mass—The Sacrifice of the Mass, I understand
why for many faithful Romanists, it matters not whether they listen or even
hear the Pericopes or the Homily; or even whether they approach the rail to
receive the Blessed Host. For that
reception (of Word and Word made Flesh) as important as it is, is not, ultimately, WHAT the Roman Mass
is all about. The Mass for pre-Vatican
II parishioners is an event, a Holy and Sacred tableau of reverent watching, contemplating, praying, adoring, and
worshipping the true Body and Blood of Christ Jesus—ON CALVARY. Oh, yes, let’s be clear, they too embrace (in
a Thomistic way) Hebrews 9.28, and they understand that what happens on Sunday
is not the SAME thing as what happened on Golgotha—but, it’s linked to it in a
way that opens a portal for parishioners to stand worshipping with (if not
physically present with the historical) the Blessed Virgin, John Zebedee, and
the Magdalene at the foot of the bloody Crucifix, and gaze into the love of the
God/Man dying for them. And for
Lutherans who talk about our own deceased as being alive IN CHRIST (He is not the
God of the dead but of the living; Mark 12. 25-27) and who catechize their flocks to the
trans-kingdom (shimmering and touching) interface that occurs at our Lutheran
communion rails (with angels and archangels and with ALL the company of heaven)
we do not gainsay the truths of said Romanist view. But, here the Catholic mindset is also
light-years away from the Confessional Lutheran understanding of the Mass. While the Protestant wants to “school-marm” you with more “stuff” to know, the Catholic stands in
quiet, severe, emotional, and reverent awe at being present while his/her
Priest offers up the Son of God in an un-bloodied sacrifice to the Father. What’s important for them is not what they
receive but of what they witness in faith with spiritual hearts and eyes. It’s the Calvary event for the Romanist. Which actually, is a far better view than making
it the Geneva College auditorium class room event for the Protestant.
And here is where Lutheranism is the via
media. The Lutheran understands that the
Verba of consecration actually
effects something because it IS Jesus’ very words, Jesus’ IS make it so! But the Lutheran pastor and flock, rather
than focusing solely on Calvary’s six hours of suffering, pain, and death
(although that is certainly a part of the input into the Sacrament!) also
connects The Sacrament,by faith, to the Maundy Thursday, upper room reality—i.e. the giving,
the feeding, the reception of Christ’s Body and Blood for forgiveness and
peace. Peter, James and Matthew didn’t
sit around the table on that night in silence, observing, and meditating on
Jesus’ love—they ATE & DRANK! That was the whole point: "Take EAT, Take DRINK" and "given and shed FOR YOU..."
Following Luther’s axiom that the drunken
horse rider must avoid falling off on either side of the
beast, the New Testament Saint, normed by both Scripture and the Symbols, must
avoid both the excess of turning the Mass into a Theology Lecture on the one
hand (though there will be catechesis in our Service to be sure) and a pious
mystic quiescence on the other hand (though there will be reverence and solemnity at
the true mysterion/sacramental-union of Body and Blood with bread and
wine).
The same way a Lutheran will resist the
attempts of both Protestants and Romanists to choose either/or, we must remain on
the narrow way of BOTH Law & Gospel, Faith & Works, and Christ’s Teachings
& Christ’s true and very Body and Blood for forgiveness and strength.
We do take joy and comfort in learning more
of Holy Writ—which is all simply more Jesus…His Person and His Work. And we do norm our conduct and passive
receptivity by the belief that Christ IS actually present with His Body and
Blood, to be placed on our tongues.
Not our works in being smart or memorizing
and grasping knowledge; not our works in
observing, yearning, weeping, and keeping company with the Saints of all ages
at the foot of the Cross: But God’s Work
in Christ Jesus His Son, FOR US!
Gottesdienst.
Fascinating Fr. Jay Watson! I have often argued that Lutheranism sometimes does sit better than Anglicanism in the center of classic Christian orthodoxy, but not in the way you present! I am actually currently leading a study of Eastern Christianity at our local LCMS congregation for Sunday School, and in a similar way am pointing out how we sit between the Orthodox, Rome, and Evangelical Protestants.
ReplyDeleteIn a related note, have you seen the sermon/study by the retired leader of the Orthodox Anglican Church called "The Disciplined Center" by Scott McLaughlin?:
http://orthodoxanglican.net/?p=1
I'm interested as to how much of this you think applies to Lutherans perhaps better than our faithful Anglican friends.
Thank you for your comment hayesworldview! I would agree that it appears that traditionalist and Confessional Lutherans have more in common (at least in their view of reverent worship and sacramental piety) with the "continuing" conservative (and "High") Anglican communities than we do with liberal "lutherans" and bronze-age (our own title) crypto-Calivinist lutherans.
ReplyDeletePax,
Fr W